Given that I refuse to drink water containing so-called fluoride, I am often asked where I get my water? I haul water in number 2 jugs from the famous Lynnwood well. I use it for drinking, cooking, and washing vegetables. I also have a distiller, which is the most reliable and economical way to remove fluoride and everything else from tap water. And I take other reasonable steps to protect myself from the toxic waste added to our tap water. See: www.fluoride-class-action.com/protect.
But I am not the most one needing protection the most. The embryo, fetus, and infant are by far the most vulnerable. Their cells are rapidly dividing. Fluoride ion, lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium, and thallium – all of these present in the treated drinking water which Everett Utilities delivers – interfere with DNA replication and protein construction. See: http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/reproduction.
The numbers of atoms of these poisons in a liter of fluoridated tap water is in the trillions. There are can be up to 13 trillion atoms of arsenic per liter of tap water fluoridated at 1.0 ppm floride ion. There can be up to 4 trillion atoms of lead in a liter of water fluoridated at 1.0 ppm fluoride ion. http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/what-is-in-it.
You say, but the concentration of arsenic is extremely dilute. Dilution is the solution, you say. You say, the concentration of arsenic coming from the added “fluoride” is only 1.6 ppb. That sounds like a very low level. However, when you multiply by Avogadro’s Number, this 1.6 ppb level of arsenic added along with the so-called fluoride equals 12.8 trillion atoms of arsenic per liter of tap water. You seem to be certain these trillions of atoms of toxins are harmless. You have not provided any proof that this level of arsenic is of no concern. Arsenic is a proven Type 1 human carcinogen. No level of a Type 1 human carcinogen is safe.
In 2006 the NRC told EPA to go do more studies because the 4 ppm and 2 ppm action levels set for naturally occurring calcium fluoride were not protective of health. It is not calcium fluoride which fluoridationists are adding but fluorosilicic acid, which contains no calcium to buffer it. But fluoridationists have never done the studies which the NRC said should be done, nor the FDA, EPA nor the CDC. They did not do the studies because they did not want to know what the studies would prove.
You admit that around 10% of our kids are getting noticeable and embarrassing degree of fluorosis. http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/dental-fluorosis-how-it-happens
You have read the solid experiments, done by supporters of fluoridation, which show consistently that around 1% of the population is allergic or hypersensitive to fluoride. See: http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/hypersensitives-effects-from-ingestion-of-fluoride
Your own ADA and CDC post articles which admit that any benefit from fluoride is “primarily topical” but you insist that we consume it systemically. See: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001396.htm
You have read Bill Osmunson’s explanations regarding the new non-fluoridated toothpastes which remineralize teeth with calcium and phosphorus and do a much better than fluoridated toothpaste. Calcium and phosphorus are the real components of healthy teeth. Fluoride is not. See: http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/chocolate-toothpaste-better-than-fluoridated-ada-convention
Your hero Dr. Featherstone, DDS, writes in the ADA journal that chlorhexidine is used successfully in Europe and is effective at killing the bacteria that cause caries and gum problems. http://fluoride-class-action.com/wp-content/uploads/science-and-practice-of-caries-prevention-john-featherstone-JADA-july-2000.pdf
The main draw for the fluoridation lie is that otherwise respectable authorities – all in white coats – endorse fluoridation and so too do government agencies. And you trust your respectable authorities and your government agencies uncritically and completely. Even though our government agencies have in part been taken over by the industries they regulate through the “revolving door”.
Read about the the “revolving door” in the FDA: http://www.fluoride-class-action.com/fda-taken-over-by-the-industries-it-regulates.
Read about the “revolving door” in the EPA: http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/24361-how-the-epa-faked-the-entire-science-of-sewage-sludge-safety-a-whistleblowers-story
I explained to you that the same chemical companies which make the fluorosilicic acid can sit on the National Sanitation Foundation board. That’s the NSF, the trade association which certifies fluorosilicic acid to be safe. Those chemical companies donate generously to dental and medical collages and to politicians on all levels. They strive mightily to get their people in positions of power in the FDA, EPA, CDC, and in medical and dental schools. But you dismiss all such talk as conspiracy theories.
You are trapped in the fluoride maze, and you have a quick or clever lie blocking each exit.
You are trapped just like cultists in a particular fundamentalist religious maze. It makes no sense, but you believe in fluoridation by your faith in the priests who wear robes. No, I mean the MDs and DDSs who wear white coats. You can’t imagine that they might be wrong or might be subverted.
You are uncaring. You admit that so-called fluoride causes fluorosis, but instead of stopping fluoridation you lower the level of the so-called fluoride to the point where where it only causes noticeable fluorosis in around 10% of the kids. You consider it to be acceptable to give 10% of the kids noticeable fluorosis in order to reduce tooth decay 25% (a figure that is probably too high).
You make arguments that are nonsensical. You say that you have not seen people falling down dead. So called fluoride is not an immediate poison. It is chronic over a period of years. You do not get that.
You ignore the fact that some people drink a lot more tap water, including fetuses, infants, those with thyroid and kidney disease, those with diabetes who drink ten liters of water a day, athletes, those who work in the hot sun.
You admit that some people should not drink fluoridated water, but it is it is their duty to find an alternate source of water. In effect, it is your position that drinking water need not be safe for all. Treated water is so good for the majority that the minority who are harmed by it are acceptable collateral damage.
You are willing to write off a large chunk of the population for the greater good as you perceive it.
You don’t care because you are afraid to think critically.
I have explained to you how the fluoridationsts hired Edward Bernays to sell fluoridation the way he had sold cigarettes to women. His method was to recruit doctors and dentists and pay them to endorse smoking as good for digestion and then put their endorsement in magazines. Likewise, he recruited doctors and dentists to endorse fluoridation.
You guys are suckers enough to believe the salesmanship of the National Sanitation Foundation, the CDC, the EPA, and the phosphate fertilizer industry.
You fluoridationists are trapped in a fluoride maze and are having trouble finding your way out. But you do not seem to care. Or maybe you did not take basic high school biology and chemistry. You seem to be afraid to think a new thought. Maybe you take contributions from unthinking fluoridationist dentists.
My science advisor and I have made numerous presentations to the Snohomish County Health Department, in person and by letter. Nothing seems to get through to you.
You fluoridationists are immune to logic. You have been suckered into believing a big lie.
You are bamboozled.
James Robert Deal, Attorney & Broker
James at James Deal dot com
Sign up for emails
I have expenses to cover, and so I will continue to work through my campaign.
James Robert Deal, Attorney Broker
Madison Partners Real Estate
James at James Deal dot com