ICNIRP, is an International group of scientists the government relies on to set radiation limits but their studies do not recognise any biological effects. It bases our exposure limits on a thermal effect. The radiation has to be so strong that it heats up your organs before it is restricted. That’s why our safety limits are so high. Switzerland, Italy, Russia and China all have exposure limits thousands of times below ours. In Saltsburg the government advised against WIFI altogether.
The French National Assembly has adopted a bill to limit exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) generated by wireless technologies – cell phones, tablets, WIFI etc. This bill will mean the following:
- A ban on WIFI in all childcare facilities for children under the age of 3.
- Cell phone manufacturers will have to recommend the use of hand-free kits.
- A ban on all advertising targeting children under 14.
A recent International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) report suggested that EMF exposures can be more devastating in children because their brain tissue is more conductive, their skulls are thinner, they have smaller brains with softer brain tissue allowing radiation to penetrate more effectively. And, a potentially longer period of exposure due to use beginning at an earlier age. This new French bill seems to have taken these concerns into account.
Dr Ian Gibson, former Norwich North MP said in the BBC documentary ‘The British government were not adhering to the guidelines they commissioned. Industry ‘rules’ in this area and the precautionary principle and the safety of people who may benefit to some extent, from the technologies, are completely dismissed’.
Sir William Stewart also wants a new investigation. He stated ‘There are people who are electro sensitives and feel the effects. They are the human canaries of the future’. So yet again we have another example of human guinea pigs. Do we really want our children to be the canaries in the coal mine? If the technology has not been tested for the pulse radiation that it emits, then how can this be deemed to be safe? Tony Blair and his Billion pound contracts with the telecommunication industries obviously wanted to ignore this fact.
Professor Henry Lai, Dr Gerd Oberfeld, and Dr Olle Johansson all appeared on the Panorama documentary and spoke of the dangers of this type of radiation. I am not promoting the BBC in any way, but here are the links to the documentary.
Page 6 states that “Caution should be used to prevent exposure to substances in Group 2B”.
The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, and COSHH (Control of Substances Hazardous to Health)  means that the first step must always be to remove the hazard altogether if possible.
It seems to me that anyone who is reading this article from London Underground should be approaching their union representatives to get this technology removed from the tube system.
Wireless radiation that children are being exposed to in the classroom has caused so much concern amongst pediatricians in America, 60,000 of them have written to congress urging the removal of WIFI technology from schools.
I have been in touch with Professor Olle Johansson who also says ‘There is growing scientific evidence that children are likely to be more vulnerable to pulsed microwave radiation than adults, and new research shows there may be other serious effects on behaviour and learning ability. There is general agreement among scientists that electromagnetic fields penetrate into the brain of children more than in adults because children’s skulls are thinner. There is also a broad consensus that children are more vulnerable to adverse effects from radiation because their bodies are still developing.
The World Health Organisation, in 2011, classified electromagnetic fields from wireless information as possible carcinogens. The Council of Europe’s Environment Committee in its Resolution no. 1815 from May 2011 calls for strong measures to protect the public against harmful effects of radiation, including a ban on mobile phones and wireless Internet in schools with regard to children’s health’.
Here is the professor talking about the BioInitiative report with over 2,000 references to the harmful effects of this radiation.
The BioInitiative 2012 Report has been prepared by 29 authors from ten countries, ten holding medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MsC, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS.
Also I have been in touch with Barrie Trower, who has written and published the 2013 WIFI report.
This is entitled WIFI – A Thalidomide in the making. Who cares? That is what I ask myself every day. It seems to me that so many people are bamboozled by the ever-increasing intensity of this meme we live in and are not looking at what is happening around them. This is a very frustrating place for the people who have woken up and are putting themselves out there to make a difference.Now is your chance to get involved and do something constructive.
You can download a copy of the 2013 WIFI report from our website together with a notice you can send to your head teacher to say that they have now received this information and are responsible for the detrimental effects of this technology under their Duty of Care to the children. Allow the Headmaster to respond and see if you can get the WIFI removed with just the information. If this doesn’t happen for you, we need you to confirm the headmaster is not going to take the WIFI out of the school, send us this information and any correspondence you have with the school and we will take the matter further on a larger scale.
Here is the link to the page:
We also urge you to write to your local MP, MEP and councillors with the downloadable letter again fromhttp://www.ministryofhealth.org.uk/wificampaign and send it through the website https://www.writetothem.com. Please collect all responses, both good and bad as we are going to collate all evidence and will be seeking criminal negligence charges from these people if they do not act. This is the wording of the UK’s statute. “The failure to use reasonable care to avoid consequences that threaten or harm the safety of the public and that are the foreseeable outcome of acting in a particular manner.” Once our civil servants have received this information, they are responsible for the harm done to our children and teachers through the use of this technology.
What our children are subjected to is really intolerable for us as a species. After a baby has been conceived, it is bombarded by microwave radiation in the womb because of the soup we live in today. When the baby is born, the first kick start to the immune system is from the bacteria from the vaginal tract, which is now compromised because of the bad diet many mothers eat, like pre processed and fast food. Then up to the age of two, while still developing the immune system, the baby can be subjected to up to thirty vaccines, which can result in completely destroying the immune system.
Then the use of bisphenol A in plastics, aspartame in sweets and other dangerous additives will also be attacking the immune system. Add GM food to the mix, together with the increase in aluminum, strontium and other such toxins in our air , leads to a complete health implosion of epic proportion.
The baby does pick up on the electromagnetic frequency of the mother and fathers heart, where studies prove that a more emotionally balanced child will develop when held close to the heart area frequently, as opposed to ones that are not. This part of a child’s development is also being compromised by the pulse radiation, that doesn’t appear in nature, and will be disrupting the energy flow from parent to child.
My final note would be to draw your attention to Manly P Hall’s speech on the magnetic field we have around us as human beings.
This has again been looked into in recent times, even though it is ancient knowledge, and this pulse radiation from wireless technology does not occur in nature. Therefore we are currently having to deal with an ever growing soup of radiation, and we don’t understand the consequences of our actions. Human history is distorted, contrived and controlled to a certain extent, who knows what is the ultimate truth. All I am sensing is this is the wrong path we are taking with untested technology. It is about profit, not safety. Pink Floyd sung about ‘Welcome to the Machine’. In this case with the EMF soup we live in, it is ‘Welcome to the Coal Mine’. You are the canary this technology is being tested upon!!!
Here is an interview on the People’s Voice featuring Professor Olle Johansson and Peter Parker talking to Richie Allen about the problems with WIFI, and what we can do about it.
Related Activist Post Article:
34 Scientific Studies Showing Adverse Health Effects From Wi-Fi
Peter Paul Parker has been a musician for most his career. He started as a bass player and moved onto become a producer and writer of songs and music. Peter has also now moved into the health arena and is a Bach flower practitioner, a Vegetarian and dietary consultant and part responsible for setting up the Ministry of Health. Peter is an activist in the UK with the Committee of 100 who are setting up alternative government, and is a blogger highlighting the troubles our world faces. He has also written the album Anahata recently as an expression of love for his new awakening. http://www.peterpaulparker.co.uk/anahata.html
WiFi Radiation – Is WiFi Technology Bad For Your Health?
|Cell Phone Radiation Dangers >>
WiFi Radiation Protection >>
WiMax Radiation >>
Thanks to RadiationTalk.com
The technological benefits of Wireless Fidelity technology versus the wireless hazards is a hot debate in many different countries. In the United States, a class action lawsuit has been brought against a school board who use the technology in their classrooms. In Britain, it has been removed from some classrooms altogether. Are these precautionary measures necessary, or simply the reaction of a public frightened by a technology they do not fully understand?
What is WiFi?
It is possible to form a somewhat informed opinion on the safety or potential risks of this new technology without actually being a physicist yourself.
Quite simply, Wi-Fi or WiFi is the wireless technology most commonly used to connect people to the internet in schools, coffee shops, hotels and other network locations, or to connect cell phone users to one another. Wi-Fi is certainly convenient for travellers and students, but is it dangerous? Many believe that the low-level electromagentic waves that radiate from the wireless internet source to each individual user can be harmful to your health, even causing cellular changes and possibly cancer.
The area covered by a Wi-Fi internet connection is known as a“hotspot”; this is the area in which the waves radiate to give users access to the internet. It can span several kilometers, although the waves cannot pass through treed areas. While in the hotspot, a laptop user can simply connect to the network, access the internet, and check their email or do their other business on the run.
A wireless network uses radio waves to send communications across a two-way network. A computer’s wireless adapter translates the internet connection data into a radio wave and sends it to the wireless router – the one in your laptop. This process works in reverse as well, sending a radio signal back to the host computer.
Hotspots a Hot Topic
Some report an unusual sensitivity to the waves emitted in these hotspots. Officially, the levels of WiFi electromagnetic radiation emitted into the environment in a hotspot are well below recommended levels and there is no evidence of any risk to humans. Yet some people blame Wi-Fi exposure for everything from sleep disturbances, headaches and blurred vision, to heart and breathing problems.
Because no study has ever shown a conclusive risk to human health from exposure to these low-frequency radio transmissions, many simply shrug off the complaints of these people, choosing to believe their symptoms are coincidental or caused by another source.
So just how high are the levels of radiation in a hotspot? According to Dr. Michael Clark of the HPA, the published research on mobile phones and wireless networks does not indicate a risk to human health. “All the expert reviews done here and abroad indicate that there is unlikely to be a health risk from wireless networks,” he says. “The few studies on mobile phone masts that have appeared in peer-reviewed journals claiming to observe health effects are not at all conclusive. The real problem is deciding what level of precaution is appropriate.
“When we have conducted measurements in schools, typical exposures from wi-fi are around 20 millionths of the international guideline levels of exposure to radiation. As a comparison, a child on a mobile phone receives up to 50 per cent of guideline levels. So a year sitting in a classroom near a wireless network is roughly equivalent to 20 minutes on a mobile. If wi-fi should be taken out of schools, then the mobile phone network should be shut down, too – and FM radio and TV, as the strength of their signals is similar to that from wi-fi in classrooms.”
The Future of Wi-Fi
While the debate rages on, most simply choose to use the technology until a conclusive study tells them that it is unsafe. Experts are paying attention to the concerns of those who claim to be affected by WiFi radiation; in September, 30 scientists from all over the world signed a resolution calling for a “full and independent review of the scientific evidence that points to hazards from current electromagnetic field exposure conditions worldwide.”